FERPA Checklist: What Can Never Be Shared
- Social security number.
- Religious preference.
- Daily class schedule.
The Prize is a story about good intentions gone awry. They turn into political struggles, condescending and arrogant management policies, and money wasted. They are thwarted by community mistrust which led to rebellion. Note that none of this mentions the children. It may be an opportunity lost for them. If their parents stay involved, workable strategies to improve schools may emerge.
The Prize gives little insight into what works in schools to break the cycle of poverty. The Newark example explains what did not work. Individual teachers, given adequate support, are effective. Some lessons learned about charter and district collaboration have emerged. Small steps are being taken. I will post them next. What we do know is that, in the last analysis, parents own the schools. Without them, nothing good will happen.
it is a hot topic [and contested] topic at MnSCU, considering ADA. In the MnSCU case, it is video and audio material, here, it is text based. The crowdsourcing idea applies, though…
From: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> on behalf of Ronald Houk <email@example.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:01 AM
Subject: Re: [lita-l] Crowdsourced transcription tool?
Scripto looks like an interesting project. http://scripto.org/
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Kathryn Frederick (Library) <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
We recently had preservation work done on a number of 16th – 18th century land patents. We will be digitizing them, and would like to transcribe the documents which are hand-written in English and, in some cases, Latin.
Is anyone aware of a tool that would allow us to crowdsource the transcription?
Thanks for any suggestions,
Head of Digital and Collection Services
Lucy Scribner Library – Skidmore College
Saratoga Springs, NY 12866
Ronald Houk ☕
Ottumwa Public Library
102 W. Fourth Street
Ottumwa, IA 52501
Subject: Re: [lita-l] Crowdsourced transcription tool?
If you’re interested in a fully hosted solution, you might also check out http://beta.fromthepage.com/. The underlying software is open source and you can install it locally as well.
Ben Brumfield, the guy who developed FromThePage also has a blog, http://manuscripttranscription.blogspot.com/, which has some useful information about different systems.
Danielle Cunniff Plumer
Texas State Library and Archives Commission
by Maria Popova
“When you can’t create you can work.”
About 80% of the revenue still comes from renting textbooks, which might seem a bit outdated with everyone talking about tablet deployments and digital textbooks.
Though heavily funded and with more than 225,000 digital textbooks in its library, the startup was sold for pennies on a dollar to Intel Education last week.
With the Internet and tablet devices, publishers themselves can now go directly for the students through digital products. There is no need for physical bookstores or other middlemen to distribute the textbooks. Also professors are now able to sell their own textbooks directly to students.
This IPO is not so much about the current business of renting physical textbooks but about the time after paper-based textbooks. Chegg apparently does not see a future with publishers or professors by their side, and they will probably choose more direct sales channels in order to balance out sinking margins.
Crowdfunding as a movement gained initial traction among platforms such as Kickstarter and Indiegogo, where people began soliciting a high volume of small donations to fund a litany of causes, ranging from starting a new comedy club, to funding innovative new products
Recently, however, I and many of my colleagues have been put off a bit by the proliferation of countless GoFundMe crowdfunding campaigns on Facebook, where individuals seek funding for their college tuition and personal debt. Does the spread of questionable personal campaigns make the general public less willing to invest in worthy campaigns
7. School-to-school instruction (using Skype in the classroom, for example)
9. Problem-based learning
12. Mobile learning
14. Cross-curricular projects (teaching by topic: http://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims/2015/03/24/education-reform-finland/)
15. Reciprocal Teaching
21. Sync Teaching
23. HyFlex Learning
24. Self-guided MOOC
25. Traditional MOOC
29. Four Corners
30. Accountable Talk
31. RAFT Assignments
34. Gallery Walk
35. Text Reduction
37. Traditional Concept-Mapping (teacher-given strategy–“fishbone” cause-effect analysis, for example)
38. Didactic, Personalized Concept Mapping (student designed and personalized for their knowledge-level and thinking patterns)
39. Mock Trial
40. Non-academic video + “academic” questioning
44. QFT Strategy
46. Directed Reading Thinking Activity
48. FRAME Routine
49. Jigsaw Strategy
53. Bloom’s Spiral
54. Virtual Field Trip (http://web.stcloudstate.edu/pmiltenoff/scw/)
55. Physical Field Trip
56. Digital Scavenger Hunt (http://web.stcloudstate.edu/pmiltenoff/bi/)
57. Physical Scavenger Hunt
Tony Bates shares his thoughts on the difference
Chapter 10 of Tony Bates online open textbook, Teaching in a Digital Age:
– See more at: http://www.tonybates.ca/2015/02/21/10-key-takeaways-about-differences-between-classroom-blended-online-and-open-learning/#sthash.MOymkn9F.dpuf
More on F2F, blended/hybrid and online learning in this blog:
Another step ahead/afar from CMS?
Koondis works in traditional large introductory lecture classrooms, blended classes and fully online courses that often are filled with students enrolled from various disciplines who are required to be there for their majors.
Described as a “social homework system,” a “discussion forum that puts students in small groups” and even a replacement for the campus learning management system, Koondis is showing great promise as a pill for student satisfaction.
The idea is that Koondis eliminates the need for teachers to read all of the posts. The program even counts posts for the instructor for grading purposes, and alerts the faculty member to do follow-up when a student isn’t participating.