Google Glass (GG)

See our IMS blog entry:


I start testing GG several days ago and I am still in the stage of Jeff Jarvis :

The questions is: how to make GG applicable for our daily tasks at work?

GG can be very useful for training students: by having a live, streaming G Hangout session with the supervisor. The latter can be in his/her office multitasking, while also monitoring the work of the student. E.g., shelving books for the Circulation supervisor.

A Surgeon Shows How Google Glass Makes Procedures Dramatically Easier.

my observations:
– GG is a glorified mobile devices, which, instead of being handheld is head-worn. the logic of navigating is the same, although still more cumbersome with GG.

– it certainly can have a niche as is, but it will take time (price, usability) until it becomes ubiquitous.

21 Comments on Google Glass (GG)

  1. Keith Ewing
    April 8, 2014 at 4:42 pm (7 years ago)

    Well Jeff Jarvis pretty much hates Google Glass (at least he did back in February–has he changed his tune?). The young woman who made a GG presentation over lunch on the second day at Macalester’s Library Technology conference last month said pretty much the same thing.

    So far, most of what I’ve read about GG is that it’s “cool” but “creepy,” that it’s “very personal” but “not for everyone,” and that it’s “still very much a prototype” and “waiting for a killer app.”

    At the moment, GG seems little more than an expensive geeky toy, but it’s amusing to see the G+ posts.

  2. Plamen Miltenoff
    April 9, 2014 at 11:34 am (7 years ago)

    Another way of using GG in the library is conducting “live” virtual tours, whereas the librarian can wear the gear and have live Google Hangout session, which can be attended by the perspective students, current students etc. The GG person can respond to live questions and/or accommodate the tour per requests.
    In the same fashion the static reference activities, as they are now, can be turned into more “interactive” ones, whereas the calls can be made in Google Hangout and replace the phone calls. The caller can “see” literately how the reference specialist (according to the “liaison” article, not anymore necessarily a librarian) is handling information.

  3. Plamen Miltenoff
    April 15, 2014 at 11:47 am (7 years ago)

    Google Hangout through GG has a significant delay of the video relay (audio is timely). Greg J and think that the Bluetooth + wi fi might be causing the delay. It might weaker processor of GG, but we doubt it. Following this logic, we tried to bypass the double connectivity and go straight to wifi. We can’t. Greg J thinks that the scsu enterprise wi fi does not allow such connection. i am about to experiment at home, if i can hook up GG straight to my home wifi and observe how G hangout with GG will behave on home wifi. All contradicts the GG youtube testimonies, though, since if people are able to do live feed via cell phone’s data plan, then the video should not be having problems even through Bluetooth + wi fi. Unless, the SCSU wi fi has issues… Ta da… Back to the basics…

  4. Shauna S
    April 21, 2014 at 6:38 pm (7 years ago)

    I found the Glass to be an interesting product. I think there are a lot of interesting options on how it could be used. But to quote my students, “they are cool, but sometimes they don’t work very well”.

    I showed the following possibilities to my students.

  5. Plamen Miltenoff
    April 24, 2014 at 3:04 pm (7 years ago)

    I posted this on a Google + discussion group (
    Thank you Sean. I am actually reading: of April 14 stating that: “Video calls – We hold ourselves to high standards for the features that we build, and video calls aren’t living up to these standards. Explorers have told us so directly, and fewer than 10% of them use video calls. For this reason, we’ve made the hard decision to remove video calls from Glass until the experience is better.”
    What a scam; mighty disappointed, since I wasted a week to figure out what is going on. Google should’ve made this more transparent, instead of people looking for “technical” solutions.
    The video indeed was abominable: about 10 seconds delay of the video footage (audio latency was acceptable).
    Yep, every step I make with GG makes me agree more and more with Jeff Jarvis:

  6. Plamen Miltenoff
    April 30, 2014 at 4:11 pm (6 years ago)

    From: Ewing, M Keith
    Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 10:29 AM
    To: Miltenoff, Plamen
    Subject: FW: Research Report: Wearable Technology


    While you are investigating Google Glass, you might broaden the perspective to other forms of wearable technology. The report below is very expensive, but you can get an idea of the scope by looking at the online site.


    From: Andrew Sheehy []
    Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 9:26 AM
    To: Ewing, M Keith
    Subject: Research Report: Wearable Technology

    Report: Wearable Technology
    We have recently released a new report on the wearable technology market.
    After an in-depth analysis of this fast-moving market, our analysis is that the wearable technology market is the most exciting emerging trend in the entire personal technology sector.
    This detailed 225-page report profiles 80 leading wearable technology vendors worldwide and contains detailed analysis and insights that will allow you to understand how the wearable technology market is segmented, what the growth segments are and what the market potential is.
    Companies profiled or analysed in this major report include:
    • Apple
    • Google
    • Microsoft
    • Samsung
    • Fitbit
    • Garmin
    • Intel
    • Nike
    • Qualcomm
    • Sony
    • TomTom
    • Jawbone
    • plus 70 others…
    Having surveyed over 160 companies and studied 80 in detail, our analysis is that a small number of enabling wearable technologies will catalyse what we have termed the ‘wearable web’. At present, the ‘wearable web’ mainly comprises smart watches and smart glasses but these new product segments will fuse with others to create a trillion-dollar global industry in the future.
    The wearable web amounts to a reimagination of how we experience the web: how we access information, how we capture information, how we share information and how we communicate with others.
    The ‘wearable web’ will be the fuel that will power the mobile communications and mobile internet markets for decades to come.
    This report contains a detailed analysis of how the most important segments of the wearable technology market will develop in the coming years:
    • Wearable web
    o Smart glasses
    o Smart watches
    • Personal health and fitness
    o Fitness & activity trackers
    o Heart rate monitors (HRMs)
    In this report you will find a detailed segmentation model for the wearable technology market which will allow you to understand the 13 different market segments, and also the companies which are active in those segments.
    Also included in this report is a powerful analysis of the long-term market potential for both the ‘wearable web’ and how a future generation of advanced body sensors will transform the healthcare industry. Each of these sectors has the potential to grow into a global industry with an equivalent retail value of 1 trillion dollars.
    Finally, the report contains 5-year forecasts for the unit shipments and retail sales of the four most important product segments within the market today, as listed above.
    Learn more about this report
    Andrew Sheehy
    Chief Analyst
    Generator Research, Ltd.
    Petitor House
    Nicholson Road
    Torquay, TQ2 7TD
    United Kingdom
    +44 (0)208 144 7073 (Direct)
    +44 (0)7866 387 715 (Cell)
    +44 (0)208 711 3065 (Fax)
    aaapps (Skype)

    PS: If you don’t want me to send you weekly emails like this then just click here.

  7. Plamen Miltenoff
    May 1, 2014 at 9:41 pm (6 years ago)

    From: Grachek, Sara A.
    Sent: Thursday, May 1, 2014 9:01 AM
    To: Jorgensen, Gregory S.; Miltenoff, Plamen; Przybilla, Zachary J
    Subject: Google Glass Article

    Not sure if you’ve all seen this one –

    I didn’t watch the video – it’s 49 minutes. But the article is short, although I didn’t think it really said too much. The video might be more informative.



Leave a Reply