ID2ID
CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNERS
What is ID2ID?
https://www.educause.edu/eli/initiatives/id2id
+++++++++++++
more on ID in this IMS blog
https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims?s=instructional+design
Digital Literacy for St. Cloud State University
CROSS-INSTITUTIONAL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGNERS
https://www.educause.edu/eli/initiatives/id2id
+++++++++++++
more on ID in this IMS blog
https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims?s=instructional+design
prezi for concepts
Example: SCSU EDAD process for dissertation Chapter 2
++++++++++++++++++++
more on effective presentations in this IMS blog
https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims?s=effective+presentations
Lily Hay Newman Date of Publication: 04.18.17.
You know by now to check your browser while visiting a site to be sure it sports the little green padlock indicating TLS encryption. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transport_Layer_Security
+++++++++++++
more on phishing in this IMS blog
https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims?s=phishing
Eyal, L. (2012). Digital Assessment Literacy — the Core Role of the Teacher in a Digital Environment. Journal Of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 37-49.
Common to all is a view of the level of literacy as a measure of the quality of human capital of a society or a particular area. Literacy develops in interaction with the environment (Vygotsky, 1987).
digital assessment literacy refers to the role of the teacher as an assessor in a technology-rich environment.
Learning Management Systems (LMS) benefits and limitations
Measurement allows quantitative description of a particular characterization of an individual, expressed in numbers.
the combination of assessment and measurement provides a thorough and accurate picture, based upon which practical conclusions can be drawn (Wagner, 1997). A test is a systematic process in which an aspect of student behavior is quantitatively evaluated (Suen & Parkes, 2002).
For several decades this system of assessment has been criticized for a variety of reasons, including the separation between the teaching-learning process and the evaluation process, the relatively low level of thinking required, and the quantitative reporting of results, which does not contribute to students’ progress. In the last decade, the central argument against the tests system is that their predictability is limited to the field and context in which the students are tested, and that they do not predict student problem solving ability, teamwork, good work habits and honesty.
teachers mistakenly believe that repeating lessons will improve students’ achievements.
To evaluate how well the goals were achieved, objective measurement methods are employed (Black, et al., 2004).
Eshet- Alkalai (2004) offered a detailed conceptual framework for the term ‘digital literacy’ that includes: photo-visual thinking; reproduction thinking; branching thinking; information thinking; and socio-emotional thinking.
Eshet-Alkalai, Y. (2004). Digital literacy: A conceptual framework for survival skills in the digital era. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93–106.
Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Chajut, E. (2009). Changes Over Time in Digital Literacy. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 12(6), 713-715. doi:10.1089/cpb.2008.0264
two major patterns of change over time: (a) closing the gap between younger and older participants in the tasks that emphasize profi- ciency and technical control and (b) widening the gap between younger and older participants in tasks that emphasize creativity and critical thinking. Based on the comparison with the matched control groups, we suggest that experience with technology, and not age, accounts for the observed lifelong changes in digital literacy skills
Eshet-Alkalai, Y., & Soffer, O. (2012). Guest Editorial – Navigating in the Digital Era: Digital Literacy: Socio-Cultural and Educational Aspects. Journal Of Educational Technology & Society, 15(2), 1.
a wide range of technological, cognitive and social competences—collectively termed “Digital Literacy.” Users thus must become “digitally literate” in order to cope effectively with the complex sociological, cognitive and pedagogical challenges these technologies pose. These skills include, for example, the ability to operate computers and navigate the net effectively, to cope with large volumes of information, to evaluate the reliability of information, and to critically assess what seem to be natural (and not ideologically biased) technological tools. In a different way from the spirit of modern print, learners construct and consume knowledge in non-linear environments. They need to learn, collaborate and solve problems effectively in virtual (non face-to-face) learning environments, and to communicate effectively in technology-mediated social participation environments.
It is important to note: digital literacy, then, is not limited simply to computer and Internet operation and orientation. It also relates to a variety of epistemological and ethical issues arise due to the unique characteristics of digital technologies and that are often overlapped with trends related to the post-modern and post-structural era. These include questions regarding the authority of knowledge, intellectual property and ownership, copyright, authenticity and plagiarism. Furthermore, issues such as self-representation, virtual group dynamics, and on-line addiction also arise.
++++++++++++++++++
more on digital literacy in this IMS blog
https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims?s=digital+assessment+literacy
ID: 3807768 Report August 2016 115 pages Primary Research Group
http://www.researchandmarkets.com/publication/min3qqb/3807768
The report gives detailed data on the use of various bibliometric and altmetric tools such as Google Scholar, Web of Science, Scimago, Plum Analytics
20 predominantly research universities in the USA, continental Europe, the UK, Canada and Australia/New Zealand. Among the survey participants are: Carnegie Mellon, Cambridge University, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya the University at Albany, the University of Melbourne, Florida State University, the University of Alberta and Victoria University of Wellington
– 50% of the institutions sampled help their researchers to obtain a Thomsen/Reuters Researcher ID.
ResearcherID provides a solution to the author ambiguity problem within the scholarly research community. Each member is assigned a unique identifier to enable researchers to manage their publication lists, track their times cited counts and h-index, identify potential collaborators and avoid author misidentification. In addition, your ResearcherID information integrates with the Web of Science and is ORCID compliant, allowing you to claim and showcase your publications from a single one account. Search the registry to find collaborators, review publication lists and explore how research is used around the world!
– Just 5% of those surveyed use Facebook Insights in their altmetrics efforts.
++++++++++++++
more on altmetrics in this IMS blog
https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims?s=altmetrics
By Sri Ravipati 04/13/17
In February, Google added WebVR to Chrome on Daydream-ready phones (like Pixel and ZenFone). The WebVR standard allows users to view virtual reality (VR) experiences in a browser like Chrome by simply tapping a link and putting on a compatible headset. Yesterday, the company revealed it added support for Google Cardboard and launched a new homepage for web-based VR experiments.
WebVR support on Chrome for Oculus Rift and HTC Vive is “coming soon.”
+++++++++++++++
more on Google Cardboard in this IMS blog
https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims?s=cardboard
By Richard Chang 04/17/17
according to a new report from the nonprofit Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), “Spying on Students: School-Issued Devices and Student Privacy”
shows that state and federal laws, as well as industry self-regulation, have failed to keep up with a growing education technology industry.
One-third of all K–12 students in the United States use school-issued devices running software and apps that collect far more information on kids than is necessary.
Resource-poor school districts can receive these tools at deeply discounted prices or for free, as tech companies seek a slice of the $8 billion ed tech industry. But there’s a real, devastating cost — the tracking, cataloging and exploitation of data about children as young as 5 years old.
Our report shows that the surveillance culture begins in grade school, which threatens to normalize the next generation to a digital world in which users hand over data without question in return for free services
EFF surveyed more than 1,000 stakeholders across the country, including students, parents, teachers and school administrators, and reviewed 152 ed tech privacy policies.
“Spying on Students” provides comprehensive recommendations for parents, teachers, school administrators and tech companies to improve the protection of student privacy. Asking the right questions, negotiating for contracts that limit or ban data collection, offering families the right to opt out, and making digital literacy and privacy part of the school curriculum are just a few of the 70-plus recommendations for protecting student privacy contained in the report.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++
more on students and privacy
https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims?s=student+privacy
https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims?s=privacy+government
Categories
|
Apps
|
Android Apps for Learners with Autism
|
|
Android Apps for Learners with Dyslexia
|
|
Android Apps for Vision Impaired
|
Categories
|
Apps
|
Apps for Dyslexic Learners
|
|
Apps for Autistic Learners
|
|
Apps for The Visually Impaired
|
|
Apps for Learners with Writing Difficulties
|
|
++++++++++++++++++++++
more on special ed in this IMS blog
https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims?s=special+education
Guardian uncovers 42% rise in cheating cases involving gadgets such as mobile phones and hidden earpieces since 2012
Sarah Marsh Monday 10 April 2017 https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/apr/10/more-university-students-are-using-tech-to-in-exams
students were caught cheating with smart watches over the period examined, and cases of students using hidden earpieces or miniature cameras were reported at multiple universities.
The Guardian found multiple websites that openly targeted students with devices that could be used for cheating.
prevent cheating could be to write better exams.
++++++++++++++
more on cheating in this IMS blog
https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims?s=cheat
+++++++++++++++++
more on effective presentations in this IMS blog
https://blog.stcloudstate.edu/ims?s=effective+presentations